1994 GT Programmer

Does anyone know where (if it exists) a programmer can be found for a 1994 Mustang GT? I've done some looking and it seems all that is available are performance chips/modules rather than programmers.

I think it has to be a 96 or newer for a programmer.

That seems about right witht the looking around that I've done. Everything is available for a '96 and up.

So I would have to get a performance module then...

What has been done to your Mustang?

As of now, nothing. This was a car that I bought for myself as a college graduation gift from me to me. So, as I have been getting my footing in the real world (just bought a house and got engaged), the car has not been modified/upgraded. I would like to start with the basics (exhaust and chip) and then eventually scrap the chip and go for a supercharger. That's the plan, anyway.

Is your Mustang a 5 speed or auto, I have a 94 GT convertible with an auto tranny.

I have the 5-speed manual. It's a coupe (as you can see in the picture.) It's a fun car, even stock. Do you have anything done to your Mustang?

When I got mine about 3 years ago it already had some stuff done to it, it had Flowmasters with an off road H pipe, 17" rims & tires from a 99+ mustang gt, 3.55 rear gear that I found. I've added K&N filter, MSD wires and blaster coil. Theres a lot more I like to do to it but its a start.

I have the K&N air filter in mine, too. I was thinking this summer I might get a performance module, cold air intake, and new exhaust. The K&N air filter alone made a noticable difference for mine, so the combination of those three things should give it some pep.

Do you drive in the city or highway?

I do both. I live in the city, but if I drive to work or relatives it's mostly highway miles. I would say that it gets a good mix. Why do you ask?

My Mustang has a rear gear (3.55:1) in it thats not to bad with the rpm's but makes it feel like it has more power. Its a good bang for the buck for take off speed, but bad for the interstate for a higher rpm 3,500+ on the motor @ 60 mph (did get real good 25 mpg, 10 mpg in city). You could get a 4.10:1 rear gear.

That's a possibility. I recently read an article that compares using a K&N air filter on stock equipment to the use of a cold air intake and there was no performance gain. I also read some conversations in different forums about this, too. I think I'm going to forget that idea. It'll save me around $150 that I can spend better elsewhere since I already have the K&N air filter.

Good luck with what ever you chose to do next.

Thanks!

I think the reason you can only get programmers from 96 up, is because that is when they dropped the 4.6 in their and made it a lot more computerized.