400 cleveland
Login  | |
|
400 cleveland - 6/13/2005 7:28:38 PM
|
|
|
oneslickhotrod
Posts: 1
Score: 0
Joined: 6/13/2005
Status: offline
|
can somebody tell me if there is any such thing as a 400 Cleveland? Not just a 400 built at the Cleveland plant. I ran across a guy with a 70 Mustang and he claims it has a 400 Cleveland engine as advertised by Ford.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 400 cleveland - 6/21/2005 6:02:50 PM
|
|
|
tbolt
Posts: 11
Score: 0
Joined: 6/16/2005
Status: offline
|
Hey oneslickhotrod, I think this guy is talking about a 400 modified. This motor is part of the 335 series. Basically you have the 351 cleveland and the 351/400modifieds.
Compared to the 351C block, the 400’s deck height is 10.297" vs. 9.206, the 400 has larger crankshaft main bearing journals, and the 400 uses longer connecting rods. The 400 gets its additional 49 cubic inches with a 4.00" stroke of the crankshaft (compared to the 3.50" stroke of the 351C).The 400 featured a 429/460 bell housing bolt pattern and the same bore diameter (4.00") and bore spacing (4.38") as the 351C and all later Windsor-class small blocks.
_____________________________
Gotta Love A Pro Street
|
|
|
|
RE: 400 cleveland - 12/6/2005 4:06:50 AM
|
|
|
kiarasue
Posts: 15
Score: 0
Joined: 11/20/2005
Status: offline
|
Hey tbolt, You took the words right out of my mouth except for the fact that 400m and 351m were geometry nightmares. You know , the 73 351's had the 385 series bellhousing too.
_____________________________
Courage is not the absence of fear but bing afraid and going forward anyway. There are three types of people in this world, Those who make things happen, Those who watch things happen and Those who wonder what happened.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 400 cleveland - 12/17/2005 8:49:10 AM
|
|
|
Ramrod48
Posts: 608
Score: 0
Joined: 7/11/2005
Status: offline
|
Ford really blew it on those M motors, good for a boat anchor, No power lousy fuel mileage, I think they had a chebbie engineer slip in on them, an pushed this idea....
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 400 cleveland - 1/4/2006 1:06:52 PM
|
|
|
393c stroker
Posts: 6
Score: 0
Joined: 12/29/2005
Status: offline
|
In the early 70's, I think 1973, Ford retarded their cam timing to satisfy the EPA. That along with lower compression killed the horsepower ratings of their V-8's. If you put a new timing chain in one of the early 70's engines, make sure you have one that puts the cam straight up on TDC and it makes a world of difference in the stock engine. You can find Austrailian "Cleveland" 2v heads with "quench" combustion chambers and bring the old 8.6:1 engines up almost 2 points and really wake the old engines up. The Aussie's made 302 and 351 Clevelands up into the 1980's. From what I understand the Cleveland engine is as common there as a small block Chevy is here. The "M" heads do not flow well at all as the ports, especially the exhaust are really restricted due to the built in emission passageways in the head. These heads are all stamped "M" on the top corners beside the valve covers. These heads are very prone to crack and are not performance items at all. The American Cleveland heads will have a 2 or a 4 cast on top, referring to 2v or 4v port and valve size. The only quench chambers the US made were 4v's, as the Aussie's made them in 2v. The US did make a few 400's early on that had regular "Cleveland" 2v heads on them, but that would be a very rare find these days.
393c Stroker
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
it's montreal; not modified
