2001 V-10 location of the IAT

Ford Forum Ford Classifieds Photo Gallery Member List Search Ford Recalls Contact FF Sponsors
Ford News Ford Lineup Forum FAQ Calendars Ford TSB's Register Login

2001 V-10 location of the IAT

Printable Version

Ford Forum >> Ford Trucks, Ford Vans & Ford SUV's >> Ford Excursion >> 2001 V-10 location of the IAT

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

2001 V-10 location of the IAT - 2/2/2008 12:19:24 PM

DONTHETOOLMAN

Posts: 1
Score: 0
Joined: 2/2/2008
Status: offline

I'm looking for the location of the IAT plug. I bought a "wonder Chip" all it is is a risistor that bypasses the IAT I'll try it anyway suppose to increase fuel milage and power??

Post #: 1

RE: 2001 V-10 location of the IAT - 2/3/2008 11:11:41 AM

2002BLGT

Posts: 3
Score: 0
Joined: 12/11/2006
From: Bedford VA
Status: offline

do not put that POS chip in for the IAT , it will jack like 30 degrees timing in your truck which will make it ping like crazy , if you want to add power , get an aftermarket tuner for it , Sniper Special Forces will work on that truck , and then you can add timing and change the fuel curves for more power , without messing something up , and by the way if its its got 6 wires going to the mass air meter then the IAT is intergrated into the MAF ....

_____________________________

www.dirtydirtyracing.com
www.snipertuning.com

(in reply to DONTHETOOLMAN)

Post #: 2

RE: 2001 V-10 location of the IAT - 2/6/2008 7:07:02 AM

davesbigford

Posts: 3
Score: 0
Joined: 2/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 2002BLGT

do not put that POS chip in for the IAT , it will jack like 30 degrees timing in your truck which will make it ping like crazy , if you want to add power , get an aftermarket tuner for it , Sniper Special Forces will work on that truck , and then you can add timing and change the fuel curves for more power , without messing something up , and by the way if its its got 6 wires going to the mass air meter then the IAT is intergrated into the MAF ....

thanks for the intel

(in reply to 2002BLGT)

Post #: 3