RE: 1994 GT Programmer
Login  | |
|
RE: 1994 GT Programmer - 3/31/2006 4:49:48 PM
|
|
|
Bullitt94
Posts: 475
Joined: 8/18/2005
Status: offline
|
I do both. I live in the city, but if I drive to work or relatives it's mostly highway miles. I would say that it gets a good mix. Why do you ask?
_____________________________
1994 Ford Mustang GT
1990 Ford F-150
2001 Lincoln LS V8
1970 Ford Bronco
2006 Harley-Davidson Sportster Custom
1990 Ford Bronco II
If you don''t already own a Ford (or Ford owned product), get one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 1994 GT Programmer - 4/5/2006 9:42:46 PM
|
|
|
Duffs302
Posts: 177
Joined: 9/7/2004
Status: offline
|
My Mustang has a rear gear (3.55:1) in it thats not to bad with the rpm's but makes it feel like it has more power. Its a good bang for the buck for take off speed, but bad for the interstate for a higher rpm 3,500+ on the motor @ 60 mph (did get real good 25 mpg, 10 mpg in city). You could get a 4.10:1 rear gear.
_____________________________
No cure for lead foot
http://www.hobbystop.com/
http://www.superstangfest.com/
http://fnsweet.com/
|
|
|
|
|
RE: 1994 GT Programmer - 4/6/2006 8:16:16 AM
|
|
|
Bullitt94
Posts: 475
Joined: 8/18/2005
Status: offline
|
That's a possibility. I recently read an article that compares using a K&N air filter on stock equipment to the use of a cold air intake and there was no performance gain. I also read some conversations in different forums about this, too. I think I'm going to forget that idea. It'll save me around $150 that I can spend better elsewhere since I already have the K&N air filter.
_____________________________
1994 Ford Mustang GT
1990 Ford F-150
2001 Lincoln LS V8
1970 Ford Bronco
2006 Harley-Davidson Sportster Custom
1990 Ford Bronco II
If you don''t already own a Ford (or Ford owned product), get one.
|
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
