Ford F-150 The entry level full size truck from Ford, one of America's best selling for decades.

Did I get Screwed by FORD?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2014 | 07:44 AM
  #11  
hanky's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 16,564
Default

Unfortunately there were/are several problems with the upper parts of the engine and to correct those problems required the cab of the vehicle to be removed. That gets into additional labor costs and from past experience the only real solution to the problem was to replace the engine. Believe it or not your situation was not that unusual. If you can, check with a few Ford service departments and they should be better able to help understand the reasons for replacing that engine. It won't remove the pain of the $$ spent, but it should clear up a lot of questions. I'm trying to be a little discreet and stop short of badmouthing someone.
 
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 05:59 AM
  #12  
fishfun83's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Use Common Sense
I had a piston crack in half one time on my 83 Ranger. It cracked at the upper compression ring groove. No noise, no nothing, just ran like is was missing on one cylinder.Upper part of the piston stayed up at the top of the cylinder while the rest did like is was supposed to and went up and down with the crank. Luckly for me it was still under warrantly. All they did was pull the pan and head, pulled the connecting rod out, put on a new piston and buttoned everything back up. Had no problems after that. But that was back when they actually turned wrenches and fixed stuff instead of replacing whole parts.
Ironically, while my engine was being replaced by Ford, because they said they no longer tear down engines to work on them, my son-in-law was having his engine torn down by Chevrolet because of an oil bypass problem on his Chevy Silverado truck. The difference I believe now, is that his truck was under warranty and my truck was not. I just wonder that had my truck engine still been under warranty, if they would have spent more time establishing the problem and repaired the engine under warranty rather than replacing it. It is really hard for me to believe that Ford does not tear down engines whenever there is an internal problem. Maybe that was just the philosophy of this particular Ford Dealership, but I really don't think so. This is, I believe, my problem with Ford in a nut shell. Rather than spending the time to establish the problem and offer a less expensive, but more time consuming alternative, they elected to take the easy way out on their part and hit me up with the more costly alternative.
 
Old Jan 31, 2014 | 10:34 AM
  #13  
Rusty Baker's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 506
Default

Originally Posted by fishfun83
Ironically, while my engine was being replaced by Ford, because they said they no longer tear down engines to work on them, my son-in-law was having his engine torn down by Chevrolet because of an oil bypass problem on his Chevy Silverado truck. The difference I believe now, is that his truck was under warranty and my truck was not. I just wonder that had my truck engine still been under warranty, if they would have spent more time establishing the problem and repaired the engine under warranty rather than replacing it. It is really hard for me to believe that Ford does not tear down engines whenever there is an internal problem. Maybe that was just the philosophy of this particular Ford Dealership, but I really don't think so. This is, I believe, my problem with Ford in a nut shell. Rather than spending the time to establish the problem and offer a less expensive, but more time consuming alternative, they elected to take the easy way out on their part and hit me up with the more costly alternative.
You are probably right. Most dealership mechanics are only trained to replace parts. They have no idea how to repair anything. It is faster and cheaper for the dealer to replace parts until the problem is corrected. Our local dealers won't work on carburetors on older
vehicles, they will only replace them. Instead of replacing a $15 accelerator pump on my van, they wanted to sell me a $450 carburetor, and the labor time was almost identical. An independent shop replaced the pump, parts and labor for $60.
 
Old Feb 1, 2014 | 05:54 PM
  #14  
grindman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 896
Default

the dealerships where I live don't even work on vehicles that are seven years or older. and I think that all dealerships on new ones anyway would rather spend their time replacing whole engines as to paying the cost of having to rebuild one because it's faster and more cost effective on the labor side of it. I would rather have a carb. over the fuel injection any day of the week at least then one could keep it running longer and have more control over the vehicle instead of letting a computer do it for me
 
Old Feb 1, 2014 | 06:30 PM
  #15  
Rusty Baker's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 506
Default

I don't like the newer vehicles. When my wife bought her Dodge Caravan, I told her that I would not work on it. I am driving an '85 Ford Econoline. A lot easier to work on.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nmdoc
Ford Flex
0
May 15, 2014 11:49 AM
petec
Ford Econoline E Series
1
Aug 9, 2010 03:15 PM
Roman
Windstar/Aerostar
0
Dec 4, 2007 11:48 AM
a_sol
Ford F-150
3
Jan 19, 2007 05:19 PM
ViciousFukus
Ford Focus
7
Sep 5, 2006 01:45 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM.